Proteine, Peso ed Esercizo Fisico

Minimal nutrition intervention with high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient-dense food supplement improves body composition and exercise benefits in overweight adults: A randomized controlled trial
Christopher M Lockwood emailJordan R Moon emailSarah E Tobkin email,Ashley A Walter emailAbbie E Smith emailVincent J Dalbo emailJoel T Cramer email and Jeffrey R Stout email

Metabolic and Body Composition Research Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University Of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA

 

 author email corresponding author email

 

Nutrition & Metabolism 2008, 5:11doi:10.1186/1743-7075-5-11

 

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/5/1/11

 

Received: 16 November 2007
Accepted: 21 April 2008
Published: 21 April 2008

 

© 2008 Lockwood et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

 

Abstract

 

Background

 

Exercise and high-protein/reduced-carbohydrate and -fat diets have each been shown separately, or in combination with an energy-restricted diet to improve body composition and health in sedentary, overweight (BMI > 25) adults. The current study, instead, examined the physiological response to 10 weeks of combined aerobic and resistance exercise (EX) versus exercise + minimal nutrition intervention designed to alter the macronutrient profile, in the absence of energy restriction, using a commercially available high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient-dense food supplement (EXFS); versus control (CON).

 

Methods

 

Thirty-eight previously sedentary, overweight subjects (female = 19; male = 19) were randomly assigned to either CON (n = 10), EX (n = 14) or EXFS (n = 14). EX and EXFS participated in supervised resistance and endurance training (2× and 3×/wk, respectively); EXFS consumed 1 shake/d (weeks 1 and 2) and 2 shakes/d (weeks 3–10).

 

Results

 

EXFS significantly decreased total energy, carbohydrate and fat intake (-14.4%, -27.2% and -26.7%, respectively; < 0.017), and increased protein and fiber intake (+52.1% and +21.2%, respectively; < 0.017). EX and EXFS significantly decreased fat mass (-4.6% and -9.3%, respectively; < 0.017), with a greater (p< 0.05) decrease in EXFS than EX and CON. Muscle mass increase only reached significance in EXFS (+2.3%; < 0.017), which was greater (< 0.05) than CON but not EX (+1.1%). Relative VO2max improved in both exercise groups (EX = +5.0% and EXFS = +7.9%; < 0.017); however, only EXFS significantly improved absolute VO2max (+6.2%; = 0.001). Time-to-exhaustion during treadmill testing increased in EX (+9.8%) but was significantly less (< 0.05) than in EXFS (+21.2%). Total cholesterol and LDL decreased only in the EXFS (-12.0% and -13.3%, respectively; < 0.017). Total cholesterol-to-HDL ratio, however, decreased significantly (< 0.017) in both exercise groups.

 

Conclusion

 

Absent energy restriction or other dietary controls, provision of a high-protein/low-carbohydrate and -fat, nutrient-dense food supplement significantly, 1) modified ad libitum macronutrient and energy intake (behavior effect), 2) improved physiological adaptations to exercise (metabolic advantage), and 3) reduced the variability of individual responses for fat mass, muscle mass and time-to-exhaustion – all three variables improving in 100% of EXFS subjects.

 

 

 

You may also like